|
|
Post by thomas on Feb 17, 2009 18:39:14 GMT -5
I wonder how many other texas high school teams have used a paw print on their helmets beside those already on the website?
|
|
|
|
Post by Matt Davenport on Feb 17, 2009 21:10:57 GMT -5
My guess every team that has a mascot "Tigers" has used it once in their history.
|
|
|
|
Post by thomas on Feb 17, 2009 22:57:48 GMT -5
I wonder why so many teams on you site have a generic Clemson paw? I think that if a team uses a paw on its helmets the paw should be more modern looking. I dont think this is going to happen, but it would be nice if it did ...  |
|
|
|
Post by Thomas on Feb 18, 2009 16:59:36 GMT -5
:)I know some other teams that used a paw print A la clemson on their helmets that are not on your website yet , although I do not know the exact dates.
Wolfforth Friendship ,Henderson,Archer City, Paris, Monahans, Roby, Livingston,Wills Point, La Marque, Medina Valley,and Humble. There are probably many others, but these are off the top of my head from memory. you can correct me if I am worng, though.
|
|
|
|
Post by Matt Davenport on Feb 18, 2009 20:20:06 GMT -5
I like the claws that some team are starting to use. Here are a couple of concept helmets I made for a school that does not have football.   |
|
|
|
Post by Thomas on Feb 18, 2009 21:34:27 GMT -5
???No I did not mean claws, I meant ordinary paws that are not clemson like. I am still waitng for a reply for post number 3
|
|
|
|
Post by Matt Davenport on Feb 19, 2009 20:37:24 GMT -5
I was saying I like the claw logo better than the clemson paw.
There's not much you can do to spruce up the paw logo. Maybe add a drop shadow and emboss the paw. I guess you could put lettering in the paw. Spring Hill's old helmet had wildcats or something written over the paw.
|
|
|
|
Post by thomas on Feb 20, 2009 9:07:18 GMT -5
[glow=red,2,300no, not wildcats, panthers. I would like some information to back up the theory posted on Reply number 4
|
|
|
|
Post by thomas on Feb 20, 2009 9:09:00 GMT -5
no not wildcats, panthers. I would like some photos to back up the theory posted on page 4
|
|
|
|
Post by thomas on Feb 20, 2009 9:11:19 GMT -5
Whoopsie, I made a mistake on reply number 7 so erase that reply |
|
|
|
Post by thomas on Feb 21, 2009 23:08:36 GMT -5
Woopsie I made a mistake on reply number 8 and reply number 7 so erase those responses. I wolud like some evidence to back up the theory posted on reply number 4. I also believe that spring Hill in 2004 used another paw print. This paw was blue.  |
|
|
|
Post by Matt Davenport on Feb 22, 2009 14:26:56 GMT -5
Ok, you've lost me. Please restate your question.
|
|
|
|
Post by thomas on Feb 22, 2009 15:05:01 GMT -5
Well the question was how many teams that have used a paw did not use a clemson paw. 10 percent? 20 percent? I know of several other teams that have used a Clemson paw. Archer City , Roby, Henderson, Wills Point, Monahans, La Marque,Medina Valley, Humble, Wolfforth Friendship, Daingerfield, and Paris among others. These helmets are from 2000-2005. I wold like others that use this forum to back up this imformation.
|
|
|
|
Post by Aaron on Feb 22, 2009 21:02:40 GMT -5
In the late 90's - early 2000's Frenship had a white paw print on the same helmet/facemask combo they have today.The paw print was straight up & down unlike the clemson paw print that is at a slight angle, but the art work it's self on the paw was the same as Clemson
|
|
|
|
Post by Matt Davenport on Feb 22, 2009 22:13:52 GMT -5
Ft. Worth Pascal used a white clemson paw on a purple helmet in 06.
|
|
